
Higher res:
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q10/ ... ol21-1.jpg



Hazaras are the descendants of Western Mongols who moved to Afghan under the command of Chinggis Khaan from what I understand, so technically they are Mongols. But I'm not sure the same can be said about Kazahks.Rebel написал:Impressive map. However Tuvans and Altaians are not mongolic but turkic group. Culturally they are much closer to us then rest of turkish speakers.+If hazaras are included in our group then kazakhs definietly should be with us.
If inner mongolia were ours then we would have warm and humid lands with good harvest. Wheat, rice, corn and almost all kinds of vegetables
If tuva and eastern xingjang were ours we would have several important mineral deposits, gas, and oil.
If buryatia were ours we would have tons of forest and lake Baikal. We can provide ourselves with fresh water.
+ 3-4 million priceless labour force.
I know Hazaras are descendants of mongolians who settled afganistan and mixed with iranic ppl. Genetic markers prove it. However linguistically they are iranized. Kazakhs also descendants of mongolic people such as Khitan, Khereid, Naiman and subsequent groups mixed with local turkic people. Even their rulers were descendants of Chingis khan. In contrast to neighboring turkic groups such as kyrgyz, karakalpak, altai, shors, tuvans hakassians, uzbeks, uighurs and tatars their genetic markers differs drastically and closest to mongolians. Thus I regard Hazara and Kazakhs as genetically closest but lingustically distant group to mongolians.sonid_zaluu написал:Hazaras are the descendants of Western Mongols who moved to Afghan under the command of Chinggis Khaan from what I understand, so technically they are Mongols. But I'm not sure the same can be said about Kazahks.
@ subo
Thats one of the many reasons why Panmongolism is said to be impossible, and putting aside the difficulty of banishing Han Chinese out, the Khorchin wouldn't be pleased with it either. Khorchin is a very large Mongol group, possibly the largest group in terms of population (see the territory highlighted in light-blue colour in Eastern Inner Mongolia). They have a tendency to routinely integrate with Chinese, and their attitude towards Chinese is much more companionable (much like the Manchus), because tracing back to their origin, they share the same ancestors with Manchus, Koreans and some Northern Han - they are the decendants of Jurchens.
Who is Suren?sonid_zaluu написал: btw, our lovely Suren is also a Khorchin, I'm convinced. Because I remeber her showing me this ancient Jurchen script which happened to be her grandmother's family name.

Khorchin will not be assimilated as Manju.Subuatai написал:Yup, reality sure hurts. Manchus, Koreans, both sinofied. Yet Khorchin is still following their road too it seems![]()
I did not wish to visit Hohhot due to the fact I did not wish to lose my happy holiday mood, but unfortunately it got spoiled anyway witnessing the sinofication of East Turkistan ne way. Bleh as much as my travels have taught me of the hospitality of Malaysian or Singaporean Chinese, my travels have also taught me firsthand of the ways of the Chinese Chinese people who I can't say can ever be friends with Mongols.




unen shu heheRebel написал:Impressive map. However Tuvans and Altaians are not mongolic but turkic group. Culturally they are much closer to us then rest of turkish speakers.+If hazaras are included in our group then kazakhs definietly should be with us.
If inner mongolia were ours then we would have warm and humid lands with good harvest. Wheat, rice, corn and almost all kinds of vegetables
If tuva and eastern xingjang were ours we would have several important mineral deposits, gas, and oil.
If buryatia were ours we would have tons of forest and lake Baikal. We can provide ourselves with fresh water.
+ 3-4 million priceless labour force.
It's a dialect. There are people using that language on a daily basis. If one is so easily horrified by a dialect, he might consider moving into a greenhouse and staying there for good.sonid_zaluu написал:@fushion
o_O~ I agree with you on how terrible they are at the language, and with their horrifying dialect they often put us Inner Mongols to shame by scaring off those Outer Mongols who visit Inner Mongolia lol.
sonid_zaluu написал: However, the fact that a handful of Chinese infiltrated into Khorchin is not enough to earn my sympathy either. Because they have made the choice to stay that way. Now, I know its agonizing to see fellow Mongols blindly following the trail to danger, but like I said, its the choice of their own, whether we like it or not.
By choice, they have given up on their own language, and their own culture. By choice, they have made themselves suburban farm peasants instead of lovely herdsmen. And as unforgiving as I am, I will not tolerate such flawed groups.
"A handful of Chinese". And you tell me to read immigration history.sonid_zaluu написал: Btw, if you read immigration history, Tumed, Ordos and Tsahar were the first one to experience massive Chinese migration, but certainly not the Khorchins. The first and the main immigration flow comes from the Chinese Shanxi Province in the beginning of the last century. The people living in Shanxi suffered from a series of consecutive droughts from what I heard, so they were left with no choice but to cross their West Gate (Its a gate on the very western edge of the Wall, presumably served as a border town back then) and step into our endless grassland. From then on, they kept coming and came from every angle to the point we are now outnumbered by a ratio of 1:4. But overall, most Inner Mongols have stayed strong even though cultural survival is tough out here. The only exception to that however, is the Khorchin who preffered the newly arrived Chinese over us.
Oh yeah. A couple of pimps turn the whole group into two-faced culprits. Flawless logic!sonid_zaluu написал: So, do you still believe the Khorchins will be the last one to lose their mother tonge? Wish I shared your faith though, but I don't advocate false hope, I only believe in what I see. And what I have seen is there is ongoing human-trafficing of women for prostitution from Outer Mongolia to Inner Mongolia and then to mainland China, and the culprits that are responsible for this are the two-faced Khorchins except you portray them as innocent victims. I know this because I lived in Erenhot for years, and as you know Erenhot is the border town but it also served as the recipient town for this forced labour.
sonid_zaluu написал: Thus we cannot trust the Khorchins anymore. They are the same thieves and thugs they have been for the last 60 years, and that's only according to my grandparants. If ever, there is a need to conduct an internal purge, think we should consider about them!
turks were originally our brothersRebel написал:Impressive map. However Tuvans and Altaians are not mongolic but turkic group. Culturally they are much closer to us then rest of turkish speakers.+If hazaras are included in our group then kazakhs definietly should be with us.
If inner mongolia were ours then we would have warm and humid lands with good harvest. Wheat, rice, corn and almost all kinds of vegetables
If tuva and eastern xingjang were ours we would have several important mineral deposits, gas, and oil.
If buryatia were ours we would have tons of forest and lake Baikal. We can provide ourselves with fresh water.
+ 3-4 million priceless labour force.